Including the part where we tell you not to replace the thing you already run. We build something else, and pretending otherwise would waste your time and ours.
Scheduling software and marketing software both get called "tree service software" and they solve opposite halves of the business.
| Tool | What it is genuinely for |
|---|---|
| Jobber | Generalist field service. Strong for a solo operator or a couple of crews who want clean scheduling and invoicing without a big implementation. |
| Arborgold | Tree-native. Plant health care programs and a geolocated tree inventory with treatment history, which is the thing a generalist tool does not have. |
| SingleOps | Green-industry all-in-one, aimed at larger operations that want one system from estimate to invoice. |
| ServiceTitan | Enterprise. Real capability, real implementation cost, and it only makes sense at a size most tree companies never reach. |
| TreePro | Everything before the job is sold, plus the reputation loop after it. Hands the won job to whichever of the above you already use. |
Public review sites for this category are unusually candid, and the same three complaints recur across products.
Proposals that do not arrive. Operators report quotes and invoices reaching clients only part of the time, with some describing five-figure losses on work that was never actually presented. If your software cannot show you that a proposal was delivered and opened, you are guessing.
Implementation that never finishes. Months of onboarding, then more money, before the thing is fully working.
Interfaces that change under you. One reviewer put it exactly: as tree people it is hard to navigate a new software. That is not a complaint about intelligence. It is a complaint about tools designed by people who have never used one with gloves off in a truck.
That last one sorts the category faster than any feature grid.
TreePro does not do dispatch, crew assignment, timesheets, invoicing or job costing, and there is no plan to. Those are solved, you already pay for one of them, and making you migrate to get a better website would be a bad trade for you.
What we do is the half nobody serves well: the hour between the phone ringing and the job being sold, and the reputation loop after it closes. Then the won job goes across to whatever runs your schedule.
If you are looking for a replacement for Jobber, this is not it, and we would rather you found that out here than on a call.
This page compares us to products with thousands of users and years of production hardening. That comparison is not flattering to us on maturity and we are not going to pretend otherwise.
What we have is a clear view of the half of the problem the others leave alone, the homework to back it, and a build log with our mistakes in it. If that is not enough yet, come back in a few months.